007 – Jesus didn’t wear long hair – Christ wore short hair – The hair of Jesus was short – Jesus didn’t have long hair.

Jesus had short hair, it is not a trivial issue, it is very important to clarify and accept it, those who make money with his false image (eg the Turin mantle), downplay it due importance.

In this blog and based on logical intertextual relationships, I denounce the lies of the Bible and rescue some truths from the apocrypha, and that distinguishes me from the rest. I make use of scripts and didactic images of my creation, with which I satirize against religious scammers, by the way, I don’t charge a penny, I don’t sell any article related to this topic, I haven’t even trained as a writer, I am an ex-computer programmer who is basically here for self-defense, I am inspired by justice.

The three passages of the Bible that are the pillars of my affirmation that Jesus could not be seen as he is shown in paintings, statues and films in which he is represented by a man with long hair, whose hair falls on his shoulders, hair which looks feminin, as the hair of a woman:

Deuteronomy 22:5 `The habiliments of a man are not on a woman, nor doth a man put on the garment of a woman, for the abomination of Jehovah thy God [is] any one doing these.
Isaiah 42:1 Lo, My servant, I take hold on him, My chosen one — My soul hath accepted, I have put My Spirit upon him, Judgment to nations he bringeth forth.
1 Corinthians 11:1-16
1 Corinthians 11:1Followers of me become ye, as I also [am] of Christ.
2 And I praise you, brethren, that in all things ye remember me, and according as I did deliver to you, the deliverances ye keep,
3 and I wish you to know that of every man the head is the Christ, and the head of a woman is the husband, and the head of Christ is God.
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having the head covered, doth dishonour his head,
5 and every woman praying or prophesying with the head uncovered, doth dishonour her own head, for it is one and the same thing with her being shaven,
6 for if a woman is not covered — then let her be shorn, and if [it is] a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven — let her be covered;
7 for a man, indeed, ought not to cover the head, being the image and glory of God, and a woman is the glory of a man,
8 for a man is not of a woman, but a woman [is] of a man,
9 for a man also was not created because of the woman, but a woman because of the man;
10 because of this the woman ought to have [a token of] authority upon the head, because of the messengers;
11 but neither [is] a man apart from a woman, nor a woman apart from a man, in the Lord,
12 for as the woman [is] of the man, so also the man [is] through the woman, and the all things [are] of God.
13 In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God?
14 doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him?
15 and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;
16 and if any one doth think to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the assemblies of God.

Now let’s do the analysis, the relation of the three passages indicated above:

Deuteronomy 22:5 has a message that points to an unmistakable address: The appearance of a man and the appearance of a woman, this passage tells us that man must look like a man
and that the woman must look like a woman, because the way you dress is part of the personal appearance.

This passage also teaches with total clarity that God does not like people who dress like people of the opposite sex, that is, whose appearance is like that of the opposite sex, now it is undeniable that the haircut is part of personal appearance.

If a man had used long hair to the shoulders as women do, as it is clear from 1 Corinthians 11:14-15, God would not be pleased of this man, and that was not the case of Jesus Christ, because God was pleased on Jesus Christ, as it is well written in Isaiah 42:1.

As if this was not enough evidence; in 1 Corinthians 11:1 Paul says that he imitates Christ, if the one who imitates Christ says that for a man to grow his hair, (according to the context, in such a way that it forms a veil with his hair), that is a dishonour to that man, and that on the contrary, for the woman it is a honor to her to let her hair grow long, because that way she forms a natural veil, the message is very clear, that is because Christ, whom Paul imitated, did not use long hair either, but short, because Christ was a man, and as a man he could also bleed, as Christ bled on the cross and as a man he could also die, as Christ died on the cross.

Are you not convinced yet? Let’s make an analysis even more complex and with more elements of judgment (more biblical texts):

Let’s analyze the texts that detail the time of the betrayal of Judas Iscariot against Jesus, there are two versions mutually exclusive in the Bible, but in both you can reach the same conclusion: The title of my publication:

Version # 1: Gospel of Mark
Mark 14:42 rise, we may go, lo, he who is delivering me up hath come nigh.’
43 And immediately — while he is yet speaking — cometh near Judas, one of the twelve, and with him a great multitude, with swords and sticks, from the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders;
44 and he who is delivering him up had given a token to them, saying, `Whomsoever I shall kiss, he it is, lay hold on him, and lead him away safely,’
45 and having come, immediately, having gone near him, he saith, `Rabbi, Rabbi,’ and kissed him.
46 And they laid on him their hands, and kept hold on him;
47 and a certain one of those standing by, having drawn the sword, struck the servant of the chief priest, and took off his ear.
48 And Jesus answering said to them, `As against a robber ye came out, with swords and sticks, to take me!
49 daily I was with you in the temple teaching, and ye did not lay hold on me — but that the Writings may be fulfilled.’
50 And having left him they all fled;

In Mark 14:42-50 it is described (or intended to be described) how Jesus was delivered to his wicked enemies by the traitor Judas, those who came to arrest him needed to be capable of identifying him, as a way of identifying Jesus; Judas indicated that the man that he was going to greet with a kiss, he, that man, was Jesus, in that circumstance Jesus was surrounded by his disciples, if the physical appearance, which of course includes the type of haircut, of Jesus Christ would have been different from the physical appearance of his disciples, that is, if for example, it was true that Jesus Christ wore long hair, but that Jesus’ disciples wore short hair (in accordance with what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 1:16 that the churches of God do not have that habit  (He was referring to the custom of men using long hair)), then Judas would only have needed to say: «Jesus is the one with long hair», but that was not the case because they all looked very similar physically, the other situation would be in which Jesus and all or some of his disciples used long hair, but that is ruled out considering not only 1 Corinthians 1:16, but also the texts that apply to all those men of whom God is pleased: his righteous servants, which is the argument already discussed in the first lines of this post: Isaiah 42:1 and Deuteronomy 22:5.

Version # 2: – Gospel of John
John 18:1 These things having said, Jesus went forth with his disciples beyond the brook of Kedron, where was a garden, into which he entered, himself and his disciples,
2 and Judas also, who delivered him up, had known the place, because many times did Jesus assemble there with his disciples.
3 Judas, therefore, having taken the band and officers out of the chief priests and Pharisees, doth come thither with torches and lamps, and weapons;
4 Jesus, therefore, knowing all things that are coming upon him, having gone forth, said to them, `Whom do ye seek?’
5 they answered him, `Jesus the Nazarene;’ Jesus saith to them, `I am [he];’ — and Judas who delivered him up was standing with them; —
6 when, therefore, he said to them — `I am [he],’ they went away backward, and fell to the ground.
7 Again, therefore, he questioned them, `Whom do ye seek?’ and they said, `Jesus the Nazarene;’
8 Jesus answered, `I said to you that I am [he]; if, then, me ye seek, suffer these to go away;’
9 that the word might be fulfilled that he said — `Those whom Thou hast given to me, I did not lose of them even one.’

In John 18: 1-9 it is described (or it is intended to describe) how Jesus was betrayed, however, this version has details that trash the version in Mark 14: 42-50, in John it is said that Jesus anticipated those who came looking for him, that means that according to this version of the facts, Judas would not have kissed him to identify him.

Both versions are mutually exclusive, for if Judas kissed Jesus to identify him, it implies that Jesus did not come forward, and if Jesus went ahead it implies that Judas did not kiss him.

For this contradiction and many other contradictions, is that I am not a believer in 100% of the content of the Bible, and therefore I am not a believer in any religion or sect that claims to be based on the Bible, how can anyone say that the Bible is the word of God while at least one of these versions is false? Can the word of God contain lies?

Another interesting aspect is that Jesus is called the Nazarene or «Jesus of Nazareth», but according to the prophecies Jesus Christ should have been born in Bethlehem and not in Nazareth, was Micah a false prophet to prophesy lies? I believe that Micah was a legitimate prophet, in Matthew it is said that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.
«Matthew 2:1 And Jesus having been born in Beth-Lehem of Judea, in the days of Herod the king, lo, mages from the east came to Jerusalem,». What happened then with the Gospel of John? Draw your own conclusions, I really hope that they are the same conclusions that I have reached.

Micah 5:2 And thou, Beth-Lehem Ephratah, Little to be among the chiefs of Judah! From thee to Me he cometh forth — to be ruler in Israel, And his comings forth [are] of old, From the days of antiquity.
Therefore he doth give them out till the time she who bringeth forth hath brought forth, And the remnant of his brethren return to the sons of Israel.
4 And he hath stood and delighted in the strength of Jehovah, In the excellency of the name of Jehovah his God, And they have remained, For now he is great unto the ends of earth.
5 And this [one] hath been peace, Asshur! when he doth come into our land, And when he doth tread in our palaces, We have raised against him seven shepherds, And eight anointed of man.

Returning to the theme that Jesus used short hair, even when John’s version of the betrayal of Judas Iscariot against Christ may be a false version, even so in that version the appearance of Jesus was very similar to that of his disciples and he had to say «That’s me», if Jesus Christ had been famous for an eccentric long hair, then his identification would have been easier, except that in his last days Jesus decided to wear short hair to hide from his persecutors, but that was not the case, because he said he had come precisely to obey God’s plan, which coincides with Isaiah 42:1.

Additional Information:

Matthew 16:13 Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples,
“Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”
14 And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered,
“You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”

Jesus was confused with Elijah, Jeremiah or other prophets.
Elisha was a prophet, Elisha was the successor of Elijah and Elisha was bald.


If Jehovah did not tolerate that they made fun of Elisha’s baldness.

Will Jehovah tolerate the lack of respect for his Son?

Will Jehovah tolerate them to call: «blood shed for injustice», the blood

of his son Jesus spilled on the cross, which was actually poured out in favor of the Holy Covenant ?.

I think not and that is precisely why this prophecy has been written in favor of Jesus Christ:

Psalm 110:1-7

Psalms 110:1 The Lord says to my Lord: (Jehovah said to my Lord)

“Sit at my right hand

    until I make your enemies

    a footstool for your feet.”

2 The Lord will extend your mighty scepter from Zion, saying,

    “Rule in the midst of your enemies!”

3 Your troops will be willing

    on your day of battle.

Arrayed in holy splendor,

    your young men will come to you

    like dew from the morning’s womb.

4 The Lord has sworn

    and will not change his mind:

“You are a priest forever,

    in the order of Melchizedek.”

5 The Lord is at your right hand; (Jehovah is at your right hand)

    he will crush kings on the day of his wrath.

6 He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead

    and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.

7 He will drink from a brook along the way,

    and so he will lift his head high.

Matthew 5:17-18

Matthew 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

The enemies of Christ are raising false witness against Jesus Christ through idols and

through the falsification of the message of Christ.

Through the falsification of the gospel and the idols, they are

calling Jesus Christ:

«Effeminate man» and «Man who tolerates and justifies the wicked.»

Does not the word «Satan» mean «Slanderer»?

Satan is the enemy of Jesus,

Satan attacks Jesus with slander, with malicious lies:

Daniel 8:25

Daniel 8:25 He will cause deceit to prosper, and he will consider himself superior. When they feel secure, he will destroy many and take his stand against the Prince of princes. Yet he will be destroyed, but not by human power.

Satan would say something like this:

«Jesus loves me, he accepts to receive the punishment that I deserve for my wickedness,

his teaching is: the innocent must pay the condemnation that the guilty deserve «

Jesus attacks Satan with the truth:

Isaiah 42:3

Isaiah 42:3 A bruised reed he will not break,

    and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out.

In faithfulness he will bring forth justice;

(If the slander brings injustice, then the truth brings justice)

Jesus would say something like this:

«Matthew 6:24» No one can serve two masters, for he will despise one and love the other,

or he will love very much one and despise the other. One can not serve both God and riches (idols).

I can not love God and at the same time love you, because you are God’s enemy,

As it is written, I love God and hate his enemies:

Psalms 139:19-22

«Psalm 139: 19 Oh, if you killed the wicked one!

If bloodthirsty men turned away from me!

20 For they speak deceitfully about you;

Your enemies rebel in vain against you.

21 Do I not hate those who hate you, LORD (Jehovah)?

And I get angry against your enemies?

22 I hate them completely;

I have them as my enemies. «

Can anyone in whom Jehovah is pleased, as written about Christ in Isaiah 42:1, justify the ungodly?

Wisdom says no:

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the ungodly, and he that condemns the just, both are equally an abomination to the Lord. (to Jehovah)

According to the prophecies and the wisdom the wicked never change, for that reason it does not make sense to justify them (to declare them just).

Can someone in whom he said he came to fulfill the law and the prophecies and in whom God is pleased, as written about Christ in Isaiah 42: 1, justify the ungodly?

The prophecy of Isaiah says no:

Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; that make light darkness, and darkness light; They put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21 Woe to the wise in their own eyes, and to those who are prudent in their own eyes!

22 Woe to those who are valiant to drink wine, and strong men to mix drink;

23 who justify the wicked by means of a bribe, and take away their right from the righteous!

Daniel 12:10 The evil people will continue to be evil, and they will not realize what will be happening.

Isaiah 57:20 But the wicked are like the tempestuous sea, which can not stand still, and its waters cast silt and mud.

21 There is no peace, said my God, for the ungodly.

Revelation 9:20 And the rest of the men who were not killed with these plagues did not repent of the works of their hands, so as not to worship the demons, and idols of gold, silver, bronze, stone, and wood. , which can not see, nor hear, nor walk;

21 And they did not repent of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.

Ecclesiasticus 37:10 Do not ask your enemies for advice,

Do not tell your secret plans to those who envy you.

11 Do not ask a woman for advice about her rival;

nor to the one who seeks booty, about war;

nor to a merchant, about business;

nor to a buyer, about the sale;

nor an evil one, about generosity;

not a cruel one, about goodness;

or idle, about work;

nor to the guardian of a field, about the harvest.

Is it possible that someone who claimed to have come

to fulfill the Law and the Prophecies preach in

against the prophecies and against the law?

Is it possible that someone who told the story about an ungodly man who was punished in hell with the answer to him, concerning his ungodly relatives to whom the same fate awaited them: «Have Moses and the prophets, listen to them to them, «rebel against the law and against the prophets?

Luke 16:23 And in hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torments, and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus with him.

Isaiah 63:13 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, my servants shall eat, and ye shall be hungry; behold, my servants will drink, and you will be thirsty; behold, my servants shall rejoice, and you shall be ashamed;

Daniel 12: 2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth will be awakened, some to eternal life, and others to shame and perpetual confusion.

Luke 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; because I am tormented in this flame.

25 And Abraham said to him, Son, remember that you received your goods in your life, and Lazarus also ills; but now he is consoled here, and you are tormented.

26 And besides all this, a great chasm is formed between us and you, that those who wish to pass from here to you, can not, nor from there pass here.

27 He said, «Therefore, father, I beg you to send him to my father’s house;

28 Because I have five brothers; so that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.

29 And Abraham says to him: Moses and the prophets have: hear them.

30 Then he said: No, father Abraham: but if anyone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.

31 But Abraham said to him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded,

if anyone rises from the dead (Daniel 12:10 The wicked will continue to do ungodly acts).

Isaiah 65:2-5

In Mark 7:18 the message is: «Now you can eat everything, there is no more

unclean foods, you can eat pork, seafood, rabbit and everything that you

he was forbidding the law of Moses (Leviticus 11). «

Mark 7:18 And He said to them, Are you also so lacking in understanding? Do you not understand that everything that enters the outside of man can not contaminate him,

19 because it does not enter your heart, but into your stomach, and is eliminated? (Declaring all foods clean.)

The Jews faithful to Jehovah preferred to be killed as long as they did not consume the foods prohibited by their law. (2 Maccabees 7: 1-42 / Leviticus 11: 1-47 / Deuteronomy 14: 3-21)

Deuteronomy 14: 3-21

2 Maccabees 7: 1

In Acts 10:13 when Peter narrates a vision, he says he responded to the voice that spoke to him:

«I’ve never eaten anything impure»

Acts 10:13 And a voice came to him: Rise up, Peter, kill and eat.

14 Then Peter said: Lord, no; because no common or unclean thing I have ever eaten.

These facts were written after the death of Christ, if what is written in Matthew 7:18 was part of the true gospel, because Peter was one of the main disciples of Christ, Peter would have already known, and therefore, Peter would not have said in the vision: «I have never eaten any impure food.»

My conclusion is that Jesus did not consume the forbidden foods in Deuteronomy 14: 3-21 and that he also did not teach that they should be consumed and therefore Mark 7:18 is part of the forgery of the gospel made by none other than the Roman Empire, that empire that persecuted and murdered Christ and true Christians, for the sake of the true gospel, and did they do it to respect the true gospel? No, because if that had been the purpose, they would not have persecuted the true Christians, but because otherwise they would have joined the true Christians and they too would have been killed along with them because of the message: the Word of God.

Because of the Word of God, Jesus Christ was also killed.

Matthew 10:39 He who finds his life will lose it; and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.

Revelation 20: 4 And I saw thrones, and those who were given the right to judge sat on them; and I saw the souls of the beheaded for the sake of the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and who did not receive the mark on their foreheads or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

«The beast» would be any wicked person, «his image» would be the idols of the wicked,

«the mark on the hand and on the forehead» would be the actions and thoughts of the wicked, which are different from the actions and thoughts of the righteous.

I think that it was precisely because of the religious persecution and because the true Christians knew that the true Christian gospel was going to be falsified is that they, including Jesus himself, wrote many things in symbolic language, in parables and in analogies, or left traces exposing the contradictions regarding the other explicit messages that their adversaries intended to make them pass as God’s inspired, as if they were messages in favor of justice, because the righteous people who knew the truth (the saints (John 17:17), knew that explicit messages were under more risk of being adulterated by «the beast», I think they knew that «the beast» was unable to understand the message in the parables and I think the same applies to the prophets and their messages, because there has been always persecution against the messengers of God, because they all prophesied the victory of justice at the end of time.
Proverbs 29: 7 The righteous knoweth the cause of the poor,
But the bad guy does not understand true science.
Jesus used short hair-Jesus was not born in Nazareth, Jesus was born in Bethlehem- «even though Jesus was born in Nazareth, being born in Nazareth does not mean to be Nazarite (Numbers 6: 1-8) -Jesus did not vote for the Nazarite because he drank wine (Mark 14:25 I really tell you: I will not drink more of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it again in the Kingdom of God.) If Jesus had made the vow of the Nazarite, he would have respected it, because he respected God and therefore respected his law (Matthew 5:17 «Do not think that I came to cancel the law or the prophets; did not come to cancel them, but to enforce them.)

Romans 3:31 So, by faith, is the law invalid? In no case, but we confirm the law.). Sanson let his hair grow, because he made the Nazarite’s vow, but Samson knotted himself so that his hair would never form a veil like the one Paul mentioned in 1 Corinthians 11: 15-16, there are many who is committed to a Jesus who looks like an effeminate man, but despite those slanderers do not like how the real Jesus is, the chosen one of God is not like that: for it is written that the effeminate can not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6: 9 (Daniel 2:44))


The Anti Christs vs. The Christs // the slanderers vs. the true witnesses
They deceived us: Jesus was not resurrected on the 3rd day. // «Jesus did not resurrect at the third day» (Hosea 6:1-3 = it is in plural and refers to the third millenian (And it fits with the Internet age and after year 2000 +/- (Isaiah 42:1-4, Daniel 12:1-3, Isaiah 61:1 (Psalms 110:7))) – The return of Jesus is not in his same body and from the visible sky: The lie in Acts 1:1-11 is destroyed by Matthew 21:33-44 (Psalms 118:7-23) ; The Bible parlots did not tell you this: The true gospel is revealed in the days of the seventh angel and proclaimed using means of communication (the «trumpets»). (Daniel 12:9, Revelation 10:7))


They cheated us for a brief time!
But the truth set us free!