«Jehovah, give Jesus a wife, he needs one.»
This message of mine is a proof of my sincere respect for Jesus.
To do evil to Jesus and to any person of good will like him is to ignore his human needs: his right to life, to take care of his good reputation (his right not to be slandered), to be informed with the truth to make a decision (his right not to be scammed) , to freedom of expression and freedom to work and to be able to adequately cover their expenses for food, clothing, health, housing, wife, children, etc; But he was murdered, his message was hid and faked, his image was romanized, they paint him as an effeminate man with long hair, how many ask for justice for Christ besides me?, How many have asked themselves: «And the son of God will never marry a woman taken in his virginity?»?. If Jesus lived as a man, if he ate and drank, bled and died, didn’t he also have sexual needs?, Could a homosexual be the son of the God who said he abominated homosexual relations (Leviticus 18)?, people who call themselves «heterosexual» say they find happiness in the marriage with the opposite sex?, and does not Jesus deserve that same happiness?, might not Jesus aspire to have his own wife?, the son of the God who said: «A man will leave his father and mother and join his wife to be one body (Genesis 2:24), and that the priest of God will take a virgin wife (Leviticus 21:13), would not have wanted his son to be blessed with a good wife?, Is an eunuch the son of God?, Does God want his beloved son to live as an eunuch without his own wife?, If we agree that Jesus was heterosexual, doesn’t he have the right to take a wife?, Why should the man in whom God was pleased look like a woman if God is not pleased with men who look like women (Deuteronomy 22:5)?
The bless from Yahweh for his sons:
Isaiah 43:2 When thou shalt pass through the waters, I will be with thee, and the rivers shall not cover thee: when thou shalt walk in the fire, thou shalt not be burnt, and the flames shall not burn in thee:
3 For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I have given Egypt for thy atonement, Ethiopia and Saba for thee.
5 Fear not, for I am with thee: I will. bring thy seed from the east, and gather thee from the west.
6 I will say to the north: Give up: and to the south: Keep not back: bring my sons from afar, and my daughters from the ends of the earth.
Isaiah 43:7 And every one that calleth upon my name, I have created him for my glory, I have formed them, and made them.
8 Bring forth the people that are blind, and have eyes: that are deaf, and have ears.
Who was the father of Cain?, His father was Satan, one Satan: Cain is the son of Gadreel:
Satan is the ancient serpent, Revelation 12 clearly says it, but Satan, it is like an adjective because that name means «adversary who slanders», an accuser who bears false testimony, then there are many Satans, in the book of Enoch several are mentioned , «adversaries, enemies of God», among those Satanas there are Shemihaza and Gadriel, Genesis 3 shows that he behaved like a Satan by calling God a liar by telling Eve, «It is not true, you will not die!», therefore It is valid to argue that Gadriel was the name of the specific «Satan» who seduced Eve … and what is more, if we read the Gospel of Philip, it is said that then Cain was the son of Gadreel (Gadriel), also God told the serpent: «I will put enmity between your offspring and the woman’s offspring», and what happened?, it happened that Cain killed Abel, isn’t that then the enmity that God said he was going to put (Genesis 3: 13-15)?.
The offspring of the woman is Abel, but Abel is not the offspring of the Serpent, but Abel is the offspring of Adam and Eve. On the other hand, Cain, although he is also the offspring of the woman, is also the offspring of the serpent, it is also curious that when God rebuked them for original sin, both felt the shame of being naked, with their sexual organs exposed, this parable denotes that that original sin had to do with a sexual act and that fits with the fragment that you would have to read in the Gospel of Philip, and also fits with Proverbs 29:27 «, I’ll go further in my theory, I think what happened between Gadriel and Eva is a reflection of what the other rebel angels did with other women around the world, they mixed their genes with human genes, and those that would have it as the dominant gene, would be the «race of vipers» or the weeds of which Jesus spoke in that famous parable about the tares sown by the enemy among the wheat sown by the owner of the field (Matthew 13:24-30), in a sentence, they are the wicked, that is why there are brothers of father and mother where there is an Abel and one or more Caines, it would be a matter of dominant gene (A prophecy in Jeremiah 12:6, Jacob and Esau : Genesis 25:29-34, the righteous Joshep and his wicked brothers: Genesis 37:1-28, my brothers’s refusing to join me in this righteous campaign, but instead of it they still pray to the images and worship the false prophets linked to those idols at saying: «a holy church is that church …», etc. ) .. And I go even further, the councils which decided which texts to appear or not appear in the Bible, not only did not include texts that were coherent with the christhian prophecies, but also they have falsified many texts and included them in the Bible and also in the apocryphal gospels as if they did harmonize with the prophecies of the Psalms and the jew known prophets such as Jeremiah, Daniel, Isaiah, Hosea and Habakkuk, and that is more complex to explain by this means, but on my blog ai20.me, I explain it.
But as a sample of the content in my blog, just consider these two reasoning:
The Bible says something absurd in Acts 1, it says that Jesus was resurrected and that he will come in the clouds as he was supposedly taken, that is absurd, because it contradicts Hosea 6: 1-3 (this prophecy of the resurrection in the thrid day, speaks of many people, not of only one person, and in the prophetic language, a day is many times metaphorical for 1000 years …, it does not refer to literal days (Psalm 90: 4)), and Matthew 21: 33-44, which refers precisely to the second coming of Christ prophesied in Psalms 118 and Psalms 110, denies the version of the second comming of Jesus in Acts 1.
I believe that it is logical to love those who love us and to hate those who hate us, I think it is better to make it clear that this is our standard of life, that way those who hate us will think twice before doing us any harm from intentionally because they will know that we retaliate without fear of breaking our faith, I do not accept this:
«That idiot is a Christian, he blesses those who curse him, he pays for evil with good, if I attack him he will not retaliate!»
«The UFO attacks the Dragon, Dragon says «love the enemy, stop your attacks», the driver of the UFO mocks at the Dragon: «Preach with the example and give your life for me, I will think about it after that, but there is not commitment from my side, you are not in a position to put conditions!!»
I am sure that this doctrine was not taught by Jesus, but rather it is a doctrine incorporated from sources of «Greek wisdom», and that the same thing happens in the phrase: «do with others always as you would like them to do with you», it does not make sense , because impunity is being promoted for acts of evil and not a proportional punishment that some deserve and others do not deserve nor would they like to deserve.
If you read the Bible analytically you will find this inconsistency that I am going to explain:
If Jesus really said: «If you do good to those who do good to you only, what will be your reward? Luke 6: 32-35».
Why then, in the judgment of the nations, does Jesus bless those who did good to him and at the same time he curses those who did evil to him?
Matthew 25: 31-40
To do evil to Jesus and to any person of good will like him is to ignore his human needs: his right to life, to take care of his good reputation (his right not to be slandered), to be informed with the truth to make a decision (his right not to be scammed) , to freedom of expression and freedom to work and to be able to adequately cover their expenses for food, clothing, health, housing, wife, children, etc; But he was murdered, his message was hid and faked, his image was romanized, they paint him as an effeminate man with long hair, how many ask for justice for Christ besides me?, How many have asked themselves: «And the son of God will never marry a woman taken in his virginity?»?. If Jesus lived as a man, if he ate and drank, bled and died, didn’t he also have sexual needs?, Could a homosexual be the son of the God who said he abominated homosexual relations (Leviticus 18)?, people who call themselves «heterosexual» say they find happiness in the marriage with the opposite sex?, and does not Jesus deserve that same happiness?, might not Jesus aspire to have his own wife?, the son of the God who said: «A man will leave his father and mother and join his wife to be one body (Genesis 2:24), and that the priest of God will take a virgin wife (Leviticus 21:13), would not have wanted his son to be blessed with a good wife?, Is an eunuch the son of God?, Does God want his beloved son to live as an eunuch without his own wife?, If we agree that Jesus was heterosexual, doesn’t he have the right to take a wife?, Why should the man in whom God was pleased look like a woman if God is not pleased with men who look like women (Deuteronomy 22: 5)?
Meditation of Jose Galindo in the soccer field.
Here I meditate:
If you come to a conclusion that what I concluded about the «new testament» is true, they you can not discard that it may have also ocurred with «old testament» in the Bible.
Are all the books of the old testament in the Bible really inspired by God?, Were not the prophets such as Isaiah and Jeremiah persecuted because of the prophecies they wrote?, Were not there apocryphal writting in the jewish religions as well which maybe were not really apocryphal?,
The meek Abel was a shepherd of sheep and killed a meek sheep and God was pleased?, That doesn’t add up to me (Genesis 4: 4 versus Isaiah 66: 3).
I imagine Abel as a fisherman and a farmer, because after all, human beings have less in common with fishes than with mammals.
I imagine Cain the killer, as the shepherd and sheep killer, as the one who takes captive and cares for the sheeps only to kill them later and eat them, but Genesis says otherwise, and that doesn’t fit my logical picture.
Isn’t there a repeating pattern called the fibonacci (Daniel 10:20)?,
What if there was also manipulation in what we know as the words of Moses? Isn’t it the same humanity?
Jacob used lies against Esau, took hold of Esau’s heel at birth, just as the eternal God had said, «the serpent’s offspring will strike the heel of woman’s offspring», Jacob used the swindle to steal the blessing of his father to Esau’s detriment, does that make a righteous person? God really loved Jacob and hated Esau, isn’t it the other way around because Psalm 5 tells us that God loves the just and despises the unjust? And what If the ancient religious leaders altered part of the truth about the description of the events narrated by Moses and the prophets to favor a specific group? Weren’t the prophets hated because of the message they had? Was the purpose Of those murderers, respect the true message of the murdered prophets? Isn’t that why Jesus accused those religious men of being hypocrites and of having hidden the information (the keys to understanding)?
I have not done and will not do a study at that level of depth, it would be too difficult to understand, even for me, but with the level that I have advanced, the credibility of the content of the most known and ancient religious books can already be destroyed, is not that freedom?.
The freeman: «Step aside my way, you delicated man, the see your face or to hear your words is not my goal …
… my goal is to find her to see her face and to hear her voice:
The humble woman: «Jose finally I meet you in person!»
Jose: «Humble woman, I am not like those dogs, I will not lick your photo, I am not here to worship you, but to protect you, even if I had enough money and ability for it, I will not build a statue of you to bow down before it, you are not arrogant and I am different than Seiya and the other fag men, those long haired friends of his, as you know, they worship the statue of Atenea, the witch of whom I wrote about in my letter in which I wrote to her with copy to you; she dared to say to me she was you, a woman who belogns to the ligth: https://ai20.me/2020/11/09/you-masked-yourself-of-a-good-princess-and-i-trusted-you-what-is-the-explanation-of-daniel-244-it-is-a-prediction-of-the-old-world-order-and-the-new-world-order-our-divorce-letter/
Twelve friends of mine helped me write that letter, that crown has enlightened you, the truth has enlightened you, you have been able to see the light because you have understood the message, because you are a fair woman, defeating our enemies has not been easy, but I was helped by our savior and God, Jehovah.»
And this is the love story:
The crowd: «Oh woman of the crown of twelve stars and mother of God, we beg you creature, so that in turn you pray for us who will be sinners until the hour of our death, we venerate your image so that it may bless us with its power «
Psalms 91:7 A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you. 8 You will only observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked.
My meditation: «I can not help that people, neither they want to listen to me».
«I’ve saying: ‘here I am with the truth, read!», but they gave me their back and paid attention to their idols.»
«All those people have surrender to death,
they assure nobody will never scape from death,
it is as if they are already dead.»
Gospel of Thomas 11. Jesus said, «This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die.
Psalms 91:7 A thousand may fall at your side,
ten thousand at your right hand,
but it will not come near you.
8 You will only observe with your eyes
and see the punishment of the wicked.
Isaiah 6:11 Then I said, “Until when, Lord?” And he replied:
Until cities lie in ruins without inhabitants,
houses are without people,
the land is ruined and desolate,
12 and the Lord drives the people far away,
leaving great emptiness in the land.
13 Though a tenth will remain in the land,
it will be burned again.
Like the terebinth or the oak
that leaves a stump when felled,
the holy seed is the stump.
Gospel of Thomas 23. Jesus said, «I shall choose you, one from a thousand and two from ten thousand, and they will stand as a single one.»
7 I will proclaim Jehovah’s decree: He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father.
Revelation 14:1 «Then I looked, and there before me was the Lamb, standing on Mount Zion, and with him 144,000 who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads.»
The virgin woman: «You have a message for me, what is it?.»
José: «This is my message for you:
«To find you have been my goal from the beggining, my search for you, made of me what I am!»
Revelation 12:5 She gave birth to a son, a male child, who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.” And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne.
Isaiah 66:7 “Before she was in labor she gave birth;
before her pain came upon her she delivered a son.
8 Who has heard such a thing? Who has seen such things?
Shall a land be born in one day? Shall a nation be brought forth in one moment? For as soon as Zion was in labor she brought forth her children.
Gospel of Thomas 49. Jesus said, «Congratulations to those who are alone and chosen, for you will find the kingdom. For you have come from it, and you will return there again.»
The man: That is a message in the crown I made for you, I hope you like it.
The virgin woman: Only if it says we will not seperate again.
The man: «No, we won’t»
Daniel 12:3 Those who are wise will shine like the stars forever and ever.
The best scene in my video clip, and without the Hollywood budget. – The Sea Dragon is defeated.
- Two opposite messages for criminals: «God loves you and you are worthy [of life]» versus «God does not love you and you are not worthy [of life]» (Psalm 5, Psalm 15).
Psalms 74:12 But God is my King from long ago; he brings salvation on the earth.
13 It was you who split open the sea by your power; you broke the heads of the monster in the waters.
14 It was you who crushed the heads of Leviathan and gave it as food to the creatures of the desert.
Revelation 12:11 The holy angels triumphed over the Dragon by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; they did not love their lives so much as to shrink from death in their past lives.
- «Sandra Bazan, you masked yourself of a good princess and I trusted you!» – What is the explanation of Daniel 2:44? – It is a prediction of the old world order and the new world order. «Our divorce letter».
Repetición de la jugada en cámara lenta, jugada en la cual Satanás es dejado como un trapeador en el piso, lugar desde el cual el insulta al ganador, sí, Satanás me insulta desde el piso, desde el polvo bajo mis píes!
Mi recompensa será recibir a la mujer que me pertenece a mí, mi herencia, mi novia virgen : Levítico 21:13 Tomará por esposa a una mujer virgen. Proverbios 19:14 La casa y las riquezas son herencia de los padres; Mas de Jehová la mujer prudente. (Daniel 12:13 Y tú Daniel, siervo de Jehová, tú irás hasta el fin de tu misión en esta vida, y morirás; pero tu volverás a vivir en otra vida para recibir tu heredad al fin de los tiempos … (Isaías 65:13 – El cumplimento de la profecía en el tiempo del fin.)).